>
RegTech & Financial
>
Vendor Vulnerabilities: Managing Third-Party Compliance Risks

Vendor Vulnerabilities: Managing Third-Party Compliance Risks

12/30/2025
Bruno Anderson
Vendor Vulnerabilities: Managing Third-Party Compliance Risks

In today’s interconnected business landscape, the security of your organization hinges not only on your internal defenses but also on the resilience of every partner in your supply chain. As third-party breaches surge to record levels, companies must navigate an intricate web of risks to maintain trust and regulatory compliance.

From ransomware actors exploiting file transfer flaws to ransomware-as-a-service collectives targeting critical infrastructure, the need for a robust third-party risk management strategy has never been greater. This article unpacks the latest data, highlights industry-specific threats, and offers actionable steps to safeguard your enterprise.

The Rising Tide of Third-Party Breaches

According to Verizon’s 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report, nearly one-third of all data breaches originated with external suppliers last year. In 2024, at least 35.5% of disclosed incidents were traced back to third-party compromises—an increase of 6.5% over 2023.

Ransomware groups such as Cl0p and RansomHub have focused their attacks on widely used file transfer software, accounting for 41.4% of all ransomware and extortion events in 2024. Just two such vulnerabilities contributed to 63.5% of vulnerability-based breaches, underscoring the high stakes of unpatched systems.

Financial and Operational Impacts

The average cost to remediate a third-party breach in 2025 is nearly $4.8 million per incident, exceeding the financial fallout from internal system failures. Beyond direct expenses, organizations face legal fines, reputational damage, and lost business opportunities.

Operationally, these incidents can paralyze critical functions. A single exploited vulnerability can disrupt supply chains, delay customer deliveries, and spark regulatory investigations across multiple jurisdictions.

Industry-Specific Vulnerabilities

Different sectors encounter unique third-party risks, driven by the nature of their operations and regulatory environment.

Retail & Hospitality: Over half of disruptions stem from supplier systems, with the sector’s share of third-party breaches rising from 10.3% to 15.2% year over year. As retailers adopt online ordering platforms, unvetted integration points multiply entry vectors for attackers.

Technology & Telecommunications: Nearly 47.3% of breaches involve external partners. Cloud service providers, edge devices, and gateway hardware are prime targets. A single compromised firmware update can ripple through thousands of customer networks.

Critical Infrastructure: The energy and utilities sector sees 46.7% of incidents linked to third parties. State-sponsored groups have weaponized software supply chains, exploiting unmonitored vendor components to disrupt essential services.

Healthcare: While the third-party breach rate is below average at 32.2%, the sector’s high incident volume magnifies the absolute number of patient data exposures, leading to compliance penalties and loss of patient trust.

Financial Services: Vendors account for 27.5% of breaches in banking and insurance. In the insurance industry, almost 60% of cybersecurity incidents can be traced to external providers handling claims processing and customer data platforms.

Regulatory and Compliance Pressures

Regulators and industry bodies are intensifying oversight of third-party risk management. FINRA has noted a rise in outages and cyberattacks at critical service vendors, which can cascade across multiple firms simultaneously.

The EY Global Third-Party Risk Management Survey reveals that 57% of organizations now employ centralized enterprise-wide TPRM programs. This trend reduces friction and improves visibility, enabling consistent assessments across hundreds of vendors.

According to PwC, 35% of corporate directors rank third-party breaches among their top concerns, signaling board-level pressure to modernize risk frameworks and invest in advanced compliance solutions.

Operational Challenges and Staffing Constraints

Despite heightened awareness, many firms struggle with limited resources. Seventy-three percent of financial institutions have two or fewer dedicated employees managing vendor risk, often overseeing more than 300 suppliers.

Organizations are adopting hybrid TPRM models to cope: a central team establishes policies and tools, while individual business units maintain day-to-day oversight of vendor relationships. This approach fosters accountability but requires clear governance to prevent gaps.

Leveraging AI and Automation

Innovations in AI-powered risk management are transforming TPRM. Eighty-five percent of institutions report tangible ROI from these investments. Automated continuous monitoring, sentiment analysis of vendor news feeds, and predictive risk scoring allow teams to address emerging threats proactively.

By integrating threat intelligence feeds and vulnerability scanners, organizations can detect patch lags, unusual network behaviors, and compliance deviations—often before attackers can exploit them.

Strategies for Managing Third-Party Compliance Risks

  • Conduct thorough due diligence on prospective vendors, including financial stability and security posture reviews.
  • Implement tiered risk assessments to categorize suppliers by criticality and breach impact potential.
  • Enforce clear contractual requirements for security controls, incident reporting, and regular audit rights.
  • Deploy continuous monitoring solutions to track vendor performance, vulnerability disclosures, and compliance status.
  • Establish a cross-functional governance board to oversee TPRM policy updates and escalation procedures.

Building a Future-Ready TPRM Program

Effective third-party risk management is not a static project but an ongoing journey. To build resilience, organizations must:

Develop a comprehensive view of vendor risk by integrating data from procurement, legal, IT security, and operational teams. This holistic perspective helps identify hidden dependencies and interrelated threats.

Foster collaborative relationships with key suppliers. Sharing threat intelligence and best practices elevates the security posture of the entire ecosystem.

Embrace continuous improvement by regularly revisiting risk appetite, testing incident response plans, and incorporating lessons learned from both internal exercises and real-world breaches.

Conclusion: Turning Risk into Opportunity

As third-party dependencies deepen, the stakes of vendor vulnerabilities will only grow. Yet, by adopting a strategic, data-driven approach to TPRM, organizations can transform compliance risks into competitive advantages.

Embrace centralized programs, leverage AI and automation, and cultivate a culture of shared accountability across your supply chain. In doing so, you’ll not only meet regulatory expectations but also fortify your enterprise against the evolving threat landscape.

Ultimately, resilience emerges from foresight. By managing third-party risks proactively, you safeguard your organization’s future—protecting customer trust, brand reputation, and long-term success.

Bruno Anderson

About the Author: Bruno Anderson

Bruno Anderson